LG 3D Optimus vs. HTC EVO 3D Autonomy

The autonomy of these two devices is assured by two different solutions for each capability. Speaking of HTC EVO 3D fact we have a 1730 mAh battery against "only" 1500 provided by LG Optimus 3D form. Despite this difference, the autonomy of the two solutions, as we shall see from the graphs, indicates similar values, with a slight advantage in 3D EVO, given precisely by the increased battery capacity.



In both cases, however, reach the end of the day without needing to charge your device is very difficult, unless they make real use. If used frequently enough, to make calls or send messages and surf for example, checking the mail or reading the news of some online newspaper, the two solutions are struggling to reach the evening. If we use the usual display of some add 3D content, usage scenario is not so remote given the vocation of the two pure multimedia products, then here is the autonomy that falls dramatically and becomes difficult to reach even half a working day.

In the case of a simulation used as a mp3 player with playing songs in mp3 format continuously vary in size and duration and intermittent access to the display to change the song, the two terminals showed an average range of most solutions results that are around 20 hours.

As for the video playback test was carried out by reproducing the two smartphones and other devices tested in the past a film in mp4 format for a period of 106 minutes with resolution 720x576 pixels at 25 fps and 127 kbps stereo audio. The video was played in a loop with the media player installed on your device with headphones at maximum volume and level of illumination of the display is also set to its highest value. Even in this case the result is average, with slightly prevailing on the EVO 3D 3D Optimus competitor.

The navigation tests was conducted on the WiFi network via an auto-surf script, developed in-house, on the pages of Hardware Upgrade, Corriere della Sera, La Repubblica, with time spent on each site but randomly between 7 and 15 minutes and a time spent on each page from 5 seconds to 2 minutes. For each page is also scheduled to conduct an operation of the scroll with a probability of 50%. In the two mode WiFi devices have exhausted their charge in about 5 hours for 3D and EVO 4 hours and 35 for 3D Optimus. Considering however the test results we got in 3G mode not far from each other, differentiated only about ten minutes, however, still prevail on the solution EVO 3D LG.

Finally, we tested the independence of EVO 3D and 3D Optimus when playing the same video in three dimensions noting that autonomy is suffering from a decline of approximately 30% compared to the same test done with a movie in 2D . Needless to say, if you find the video to play on youtube such as autonomy certainly will fall even more clearly, having to deal with the consumption due to WiFi or 3G.

Posted by: Wasim Javed